This week found me connecting to things I had done before, learning new things, and being a little (lot?) bit confused while I was excited about what I was learning. This is a long post, sorry!
___________________________________________________________________________________
I found I had the most stops when reading the Week 2 introduction particularly in the paragraphs discussing rethinking ideas about disabilities. Gerofsky (2024) states that "in order to minimize disability, the society would need to stop disabling people!" This really stood out to me as I was thinking about the society we live in where those with a disability often are in an "other" category and how we can change this simply by changing the narrative we use towards those with impairments. The introduction says that disabilities result from a restriction of activity that disadvantages and oppresses the person. It seems like a fairly easy fix to stop disabling people by providing everyone with the same opportunities that will support those with impairments. Obviously this is easier said than done and may take a lot to support everyone's impairments but I think it is doable especially if we focus on one classroom at a time. I really liked when Gerofsky (2024) said that "everyone experiences impairments to some degree at different points in their life" thus there is not a clear divide between who is disabled and who is not. We need to work towards moving the barrier between those who are 'able-bodied' and 'disabled' so that everyone feels supported.
This reminded me of the Universal Design for Learning model where multiple means of engagement, representation, and action & expression. Through this model teachers are providing all the students in the class with the same opportunities to optimize their learning.
___________________________________________________________________________________
Reading Reflection
Kepler, J. 1611/2010. The six-cornered snowflake: A New Year's gift. Paul Dry Books.
While I was excited about what this book included, I found it hard to read and ended up re-reading many sections to fully try to grasp what was being said. The book explores why shapes are the way they are, why snowflakes always have perfect symmetry with six points. In the section I read for this week, Kepler bounces back and forth exploring the shape of beehives and pomegranate seeds. He also discusses shapes, mainly a rhombus, and how they can create other regular solids and Archimedean solids. Kepler explains that a beehive is composed of a hexagonal plane where each cell is surrounded by six others and each bee has nine neighbors. When explaining pomegranates, the seeds are round at the start but as the pomegranate grows the rind stiffens and the seeds are forced to crowd, forming a rhombic shape.
In explaining the shapes of pomegranate seeds, Kepler explains how this connects to beads of equal size and material being contained in a vessel. The beads are squeezed into a rhombic shape. There are two arrangements of spheres when placed in a container - either they will align in a triangular or a square arrangement. While playing with my dog and her tennis ball, I decided to try this out myself so that I could connect to the reading a little more (please ignore the hair, I know it's gross but these are the only round objects I have.)
This is a recreation of Kepler's explanation to show what is occurring with the tennis balls |
While I was reading, I was thinking about how easy it is to make these changes and implement multisensory experiences into elementary schools but am struggling to think of ways that they could be used in an academic high school math class. I can see how they work in science classes with the hands on activities that arise but am stumped thinking of how they may work, for example in a calculus class, with math students who are academically driven and don't necessarily have the time for multisensory experiences. I can see how many of the students I work with would be frustrated that they are doing these activities as opposed to doing math the way that they will be doing it in University.
Questions:
- Have you consciously tried to remove the barrier between 'disabled' and 'able-bodied' before? Can you think of any instances where this sort of approach will not work?
- How can we implement these multisensory experiences into high school math classes that traditionally focus on lectures, assignments and tests in a way that supports all students learning?
___________________________________________________________________________________
Activity
I completed the activity prior to the reading however after reading for this week I connected what I read to the activity I completed.
Part 1: The beginning of the activity suggest finding mathematical foods such as a pomegranate, apple, persimmon, zucchini, squash, tomatoes and honeycomb. I struggled with this part of the activity as the less common foods are not available in my grocery store and I did not want to purchase foods that I would likely not use or were quite expensive. I tried to use what I had at home already and supplemented with pictures off the internet.
Apple: When I cut the apple horizontally I saw the clear "flower" shape in the center of the apple, this had five petals like the flower blossom below. The apple seeds fall into the cavities of this flower pattern but do not appear to be evenly distributed between them (maybe if they all fell to one half they would be even). I have used this cut of apples before with young kids as a paint stamp as the pattern sometimes shows up in the artwork. I have to say, I don't know if all apples are like this but I can't think of any types of apples that do not start with a flower blossom, therefore I assume that most apples start like this and follow the fivefold pattern of the flower.
https://pixabay.com/photos/pomegranate-fruit-fruit-kernels-2018968/ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Inside_of_a_pomegranate.jpg |
https://www.pickpik.com/honeycomb-bees-hexagons-comb-honeycombed-insect-148106 |
Paper shapes made with my nephew. We used tape to hold them together but found the larger shapes tricky to make. |
I have also made a lot of these shapes with sonobe unit origami before. I first learned how to make these in my undergrad math education class and have since used them in many classes that I have taught. Here are some images of the sonobe units we learned to make, then the cubic shape that the students have made as well as some larger shapes.
Sonobe Units bundled into 6 each for a cube Students working to make their cubes. |
The students cubes they made on their own! Sonobe units, hexahedron, triangular hexahedron, and octahedron |
Reflection questions: Cutting up the fruit, looking at images and building the shapes helped me to understand what the text was saying in multiple ways. I found that this helped me to develop a deeper understanding especially since I found the text somewhat confusing to understand. As in our introduction for the week, it says that "multisensory, bodily experiences of mathematical patterns and relationships have potential to serve as meaningful, symbolic or representational resources as students develop the ability to work with generalization and abstraction in mathematics" (Gerofsky, 2024). Through using these multisensory experiences with the fruit and shapes I was able to use these objects as representational resources to help me develop this understanding.
I enjoyed reading your post, Jodi! I found we had a lot of similar connections to ideas in the introduction for this week. I agree with you that we need to start small – one classroom at a time – to provide students with the appropriate opportunities they need to succeed. The UDL model is a great example of a framework that would help improve the learning opportunities for all needs. One of the main problems with UDL, that I have noticed, is the lack of formal training for how to apply it within the classroom. I know I had to do a lot of research myself to develop a stronger understanding of the model. Maybe for new teachers, this is something that is talked about at the undergrad level but for others who have been teaching for a while there wasn’t a lot of pro-d done around the model as it was implemented (at least at my school).
ReplyDeleteThe questions you posed really made me think about how hard implementing these types of multisensory experiences into high school math class would be – especially compared to the elementary level. I teach grade five so I have no high school experience, but I can imagine the pressures of covering the curriculum and “prepping for university” are big driving factors behind why there are less multisensory experiences. I also think it comes from the fact that not all teachers teach with multisensory lessons, so students who have been taught from a more traditional approach for most of their school careers are probably less likely to engage in a new method so late in their school journey. However, I can see the benefits behind introducing multisensory experiences no matter what age level the students are. Connecting all the senses will only enhance and engage all forms of learning. Even if traditional methods are simply enhanced with multisensory options at first, then at least it would be a step towards a more complete approach! Unfortunately, I don’t have any concrete examples to share at a high school level, but your mathematical fruit images inspired me a bit. What if we remove numbers and have students use the fruit to create/solve math problems? This would encourage students to see the mathematical beauty in the world while exploring visual arts.
I really enjoyed how you summarized the reading. You are a natural writer and I am easily drawn into your experiences, so that helps me understand something that I possibly didn't experience myself. I am interested in making the sonobe units into a cube! That looks very interesting and I'm sure it would capture the audience of my own kids. (Likely harder for my K/1 students however...but they have surprised me in their attention and ability at times).
ReplyDeleteYou have some interesting questions:
#1. I have consciously removed barriers between "disabled" and "able-bodied" before. Many students in Kindergarten are screened for hearing and visual impairment in their K year. It's almost common practice to ensure that multisensory teaching methods are practiced. What I do find challenging is mobility impairments. When we outdoor learn, or go on field trips, I notice how quickly other locations are not "mobility friendly". An example of this is cross country ski trails. If the student doesn't have the proper equipment, or the facility doesn't allow sleds alongside the trails, it makes it very difficult to adapt to a mobility challenged student. Same challenges with some indoor activities too, like bowling or ice skating. Having ramps or indoor change stations in bathrooms is often rare...especially in older buildings. Stepping onto the ice through the players bench is very difficult as players benches aren't necessarily designed to accommodate walkers or wheelchairs. Accessing the ice from the Zamboni entrance can also be challenging as there are many stored equipment that is not easily moved around. Many older facilities are still in the process of making all areas of a building accessible. (I imagine funding plays an important part to this as well).
#2. Implementing multisensory experiences into high school math just might be the key to having students retain the math they learn. I have never taught secondary math, but I have had 4 teenagers experience secondary math. Two of my teenagers are "paper to pencil" kids who like to write down notes and examples. Both are quite visual learners, and really feel comfortable and confident that they can look back on their notes at any given time and reference them. Maybe their brains work in 2-D??? My other two teenagers approach their learning in a whole-body way. They need to be moving, they need to be holding and manipulating something. They need to approach math in a 3-D way in order to extract the math meaning from it. They are quick to understand concepts but struggle with written tests. I'm not sure how to balance both? Maybe that's where multisensory math activities can help to engage those "3-D" kids. Once they are engaged and have the math meaning...they may excel at the "2-D" math later on.